References – grantwriting.solutions

Useful References

Abbass, H. (2021). What is artificial intelligence? IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2(2), 94–95. https://doi-org.uc.idm.oclc.org/10.1109/TAI.2021.3096243
Adobe (n.d.). Document file format types. Adobe.com. https://www.adobe.com/uk/acrobat/resources/document-files.html
Agricultural Marketing Service. (2026). AMS LAMP grant toolkits & application support page. U. S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.ams.usda.gov/content/ams-lamp-grant-toolkits-application-support-page
Alenkina, T. B. (2023). The genre of a grant proposal in the modern teaching context: Challenges and possibilities. Higher education in Russia, 32(6), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-6-76-92
Anthropic (2023). Introducing Claude [Press Release]. Anthropic.com. https://www.anthropic.com/news/introducing-claude
Apple (n.d.). Mac keyboard shortcuts. Apple.com. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201236
Association of Proposal Management Professionals. (n.d.). APMP library. Retrieved June 20, 2026, from https://www.apmp.org/Web/Web/Learning-Resources/APMP-Library.aspx
Australian Research Council (2026). Policy on use of generative artificial intelligence in the ARC’s grants programs – 2026. Australian Government. https://www.arc.gov.au/news-and-publications/publications/policy-use-generative-artificial-intelligence-arcs-grants-programs-2026
Bankins, S., & Formosa, P. (2023). The ethical implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 185, 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05339-7
BasuMallick, C. (2024, Feb. 16). What is reverse engineering? Definition, working, examples, and importance. Spiceworks. https://www.spiceworks.com/tech/tech-general/articles/what-is-reverse-engineering
Bateyko, D., & Levy, K. (2025). One bad NOFO? AI governance in federal grantmaking. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08133
Bauer, D. G. (2015). The “how to” grants manual: Successful grantseeking techniques for obtaining public and private grants (8^th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Beck, D., & Morgado, L. (2026). Instructor-created custom GPTs as pedagogical partners fostering immersion in online higher education: Two case studies. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.16397
Belone, L., Lucero, J. E., Duran, B., Tafoya, G., Baker, E. A., Chan, D., Chang, C., Greene-Moton, E., Kelley, M. A., & Wallerstein, N. (2016). Community-based participatory research conceptual model: Community partner consultation and face validity. Qualitative Health Research, 26(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314557084
Bevilaqua, M. (2020). Guide to image editing and production of figures for scientific publications with an emphasis on taxonomy. Zoosystematics and Evolution, 96(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.3897/ZSE.96.49225
Blanco, M. A., & Lee, M. Y. (2012). Twelve tips for writing educational research grant proposals. Medical Teacher, 34(6), 450–453. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668246
Bloom Grant Consulting. (n.d.). Blog. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://www.bloomgrant.consulting/blog
Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115
Богинская, О. А. (2025). Rhetoric of promotion and persuasion in grant proposal abstracts. Интеграция образования, 29(3), 555–572.
Bouzón-Arnáiz, I., Carbonell Cortés, C., Hagemeijer, A., Jorstad, A., Okasa, G., Thelwall, M., van den Berg, Niels., & Woods, H. B. (2025). AI and reviewer matching in research funding: Three case studies. Research on Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30885269
Boyd, M. R. (2014). Community-based research: Understanding the principles, practices, challenges, and rationale. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 498–517). Oxford University Press.
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165
Bull, J., Beazley, K., Shea, J., MacQuarrie, C., Hudson, A., Shaw, K., Brunger, F., Kavanagh, C., & Gagne, B. (2020). Shifting practise: Recognizing Indigenous rights holders in research ethics review. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 21–35. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QROM-04-2019-1748/full/html
Burke, K. (1945). A grammar of motives. Prentice-Hall.
Calvano, M., Curci, A., Desolda, G., Esposito, A., Lanzilotti, R., & Piccinno, A. (2026). Building symbiotic artificial intelligence: Reviewing the AI Act for a human-centred, principle-based framework. Minds and Machines, 36(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-025-09753-w
Calvert, B. (2026). The evolution and impact of artificial intelligence in municipal grant applications and management. Certified Public Manager® Applied Research, 6(1), 4. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/cpmar/vol6/iss1/4
Cameron, C. (2014). NSF clarifies policy on award abstract and titles. Social Science Space. https://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/06/nsf-clarifies-policy-on-award-abstracts-and-titles
Candid (2023). Introduction to Foundation Directory.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAoZlTLV6pU
Cardon, P., Getchell, K., Carradini, S., Fleischmann, C., & Stapp, J. (2023). Generative AI in the workplace: Employee perspectives of ChatGPT benefits and organizational policies. SocarXiv. http://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/b3ezy
Carradini, S., & Nagelhout, E. (2026). Faculty and administrator perceptions of interdisciplinary collaborative writing: Practices, challenges, and support structures. Written Communication, 43(2), 416–463.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Budget preparation guidelines. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/grants/documents/Budget-Preparation-Guidance.pdf
Chakrabarti, C., Hall, J. M., LeLaurin, J. H., Long, B. A., Zima, S. E., Murrill, P. E., Hoyos, D. M., Kates, F. R., Bird, K., Salloum, R., & Cogle, C. R. (2026). Building public health leadership capacity through community-based education: The Florida Health Policy Leadership Academy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 71(2), 108336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108336
Clark, K. R. (2026). A practical guide for using generative AI in academic research. Radiologic Technology, 97(3). 176–181.
Clarke, C. (2009). Storytelling for grantseekers: A guide to creative nonprofit fundraising (2^nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Cole, R. B., Maher, L. N., & Rice, R. (2025). Understanding and avoiding hallucinated references: An AI writing experiment. In T. Laquintano, C. Schnitzler, & A Vee (Eds.), TextGenEd: Continuing experiments. The WAC Clearinghouse. https://wac.colostate.edu/repository/collections/continuing-experiments/august-2025/ai-literacy/understanding-avoiding-hallucinated-references
Cole, R. B., Maher, L. N., & Rice, R. (2026). Rhetoric, technology, and the digital online media literacy assessment framework in grant writing. In Modern Media Literacy: Generative AI, Social Media, and the News (pp. 231–260). IGI Global.
Cole, R. B., Rice, R., & Maher, L. N. (Forthcoming). Convincing the machine: AI rhetoric in grant-writing workshops. Activities & Assignment Archive. In D. Coad, M. Vetter, B. S. Finer, & M. K. Stewart (Eds.), Writing spaces: Readings on writing (Vol. 8).https://writingspaces.org/?page_id=81
Colorado Office of the State Controller (2025). Colorado grants management terminology and definitions. https://osc.colorado.gov/colorado-grants-management-terminology-and-definitions
Congress.gov (2026). Federal grant closeout. Library of Congress. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF13106
Cronan, M. (2013). Strategies for planning, developing, and writing large team grants. Academic Research Funding Strategies.
Dastin, J., & Sriram, A. (2023). Explainer: What is generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT? Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/technology/what-is-generative-ai-technology-behind-openais-chatgpt-2023-03-17
DeJeu, E. B. (2024). Topoi of nonprofit proposal writing. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(1), 122–151.
Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper (24-013). http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321
Demicheli, V., & Di Pietrantonj, C. (2007). Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010(1), MR000003.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8973940/pdf/MR000003.pdf
Denny, M., Bonnefin, M., & Dickey, E. W. (2025). The symbiotic relationship between grant writing and community-engaged scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 29(4), 113–122.
Deutsch, A. R., Frerichs, L., Hasgul, Z., Murphey, F., Coleman, A. K., Bachand, A. Y., Bettelyoun, A., Forney, P., Tyon, G., & Jalali, M. S. (2023). How funding policy maintains structural inequity within indigenous community-based organizations: Study examines how funding policy maintains structural inequity within indigenous community-based organizations. Health Affairs, 42(10), 1411–1419. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.0048
Digital.gov (n.d.). Plain language guide series. U. S. General Services Administration. https://digital.gov/guides/plain-language
Duin, A., & Pedersen, I. (2023). Augmentation technologies and artificial intelligence in technical communication. Routledge.
Eisenstein, J. (2019). Introduction to natural language processing. MIT press.
Elgabry, M., & Camilleri, J. (2021). Conducting hidden populations research: A reflective case study on researching the biohacking community. Futures, 132, 102769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102769
Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N. K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S. E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–10. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406915621420
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
English, L. J., O’Neal-McElrath, T., & Kanter, L. (2025). Winning grants step by step: The complete workbook for planning, developing, and writing successful proposals. John Wiley & Sons.
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
Etheridge, C., & Schumann, C. Q. (Eds.). (2022). Special issue on grant writing, access, and empowerment. Open Words: Access and English Studies. WAC Clearinghouse. https://wac.colostate.edu/openwords/archive/v14n1
Ewuoso, C., & Chiwarawara, K. (2026). How do global health research actors conceptualise inclusion in response to decolonisation calls? A scoping review. BMJ Global Health, 11(3), e019194. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019194
Exec. Order No. 13985, 86 Fed. Reg. 7009 (2021). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/25/2021-01753/advancing-racial-equity-and-support-for-underserved-communities-through-the-federal-government
Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A., & Srikumar, M. (2020). Principled artificial intelligence: Mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3518482
Fjelland, R. (2020). Why general artificial intelligence will not be realized. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0494-4
Fogarty, J., & Moore, K. R. (2026). Lessons from NASA: Or, why technical and professional communicators should study social justice to prepare for scientific grant writing. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2025.2612525
Foundation Center (2004). Foundation growth and giving estimates: 2004 preview. https://www.issuelab.org/resources/13526/13526.pdf
Fowler, M. (2003). Patterns [software patterns]. IEEE Software, 20(2), 56–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2003.1184168
Gallo, S. A., Pearce, M., Lee, C. J., & Erosheva, E. A. (2023). A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7
Gitlin, L. N., Kolanowski, A., & Lyons, K. J. (2020). Successful grant writing: Strategies for health and human service professionals. Springer.
Godwin, R. C., DeBerry, J. J., Wagener, B. M., Berkowitz, D. E., & Melvin, R. L. (2024). Grant drafting support with guided generative AI software. SoftwareX, 27, Article 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2024.101784
Gomez, K. (2023). Plug in and play implementation of tree of thoughts. GitHub. https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts
Grants.gov (n.d.). Grant Terminology. Grants.gov.
https://www.grants.gov/learn-grants/grant-terminology
Grants.gov (n.d.). The Grant Lifecycle. Grants.gov. https://www.grants.gov/learn-grants/grants-101/the-grant-lifecycle
Grants.gov. (2018). Learning workspace – How to create a Grants.gov workspace. Video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOjwumQz0G8
Graves, N., Barnett, A. G., & Clarke, P. (2011). Funding grant proposals for scientific research: Retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel. British Medical Journal, 343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4797
Gunning, S. K. (2025). How do nonprofit proposal writers learn their jobs? Results of a nationwide survey and interviews. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 39(2), 191–224.
Han, S., Richie, R., Shi, L., & Tsui, F. R. (2024). Automated matchmaking of researcher biosketches and funder requests for proposals using deep neural networks. IEEE Access. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10597426
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qui, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., Han, W., Huang, M., Jin, Q., Lan, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Lu, Z., Qiu, Z., Song, R., … & Zhu, J. (2021). Pre-trained models: Past, present and future. AI Open, 2, 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002
Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199. https://academic.oup.com/socpro/article-abstract/44/2/174/1635494
Hendel, O., Tempesta, I., Mosca, G., & Widforss, G. (2026). Integrating grant writing and proposal coordination into doctoral education: A practice-based case study. Procedia Computer Science, 278, 1722–1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.163
Hiatt, R. A., Carrasco, Y. P., Paciorek, A. L., Kaplan, L., Cox, M. B., Crespo, C. J., Feig, A., Hueffer, K., McFerrin, H., Norris, K., Roberts-Kirchhoff, E., Saetermoe, C. L., Silver, G. B., Snyder, K., Zavala, A. R., & Parangan-Smith, A. G. (2022). Enhancing grant-writing expertise in BUILD institutions: Building infrastructure leading to diversity. Plos one, 17(9), e0274100.
Hill, C., Heim, K., Hong, J., & Phan, N. (2022). Census Coverage Estimates for People in the United States by State and Census Operations 2020 Post-Enumeration Survey Estimation Report. PES20-G-02RV. U. S. Census Bureau, U. S. Government Publishing Office.
Hoffman, S. G. (2023). Artificial intelligence and scientific problem choice at the nexus of industry and academia. In Handbook of Critical Studies of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 859–868). Edward Elgar.
Hogan, M. P., & Topkok, S. A. (2015). Teaching Indigenous methodology and an Iñupiaq example. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 4(2), 50–75.
Hug, S. E., & Aeschbach, M. (2020). Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0412-9
Hulbert, D. (2023). Tree-of-thought prompting to boost ChatGPT’s reasoning. GitHub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10323452
Hull, T. S. (2019). Risk assessment of the DoDs grant closeout process. Department of Defense Inspector General. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/trecms/AD1118070/
IBM (2023). What are neural networks? IBM.com. https://www.ibm.com/topics/neural-networks
IBM (n.d.). What is an AI model? IBM.com. https://www.ibm.com/topics/ai-model
IEEE (2017). IEEE guide for terms and concepts in intelligent process automation. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.8070671
Internal Revenue Service (2024). Charities and nonprofits. IRS.gov. https://www.irs.gov/charities-and-nonprofits
ISO (2008). ISO 32000-1:2008 Document management portable document format. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/51502.html
Itchuaqiyaq, C. U. (2021). IÑUPIAT IḶITQUSIAT: An indigenist ethics approach for working with marginalized knowledges in technical communication. Equipping Technical Communicators for Social Justice Work. Utah State University Press.
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Grant writing as a strategic tool for non-profit capacity-building. NEYA Global. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-gr-wr-ms-00
Khoo, T., Ward, P., & O’Donnell, J. (2023). Getting research funded: Five essential rules for early career researchers. Routledge.
Kirkness, V. J., & Barnhardt, R. (1991). First nations and higher education: The four R’s — respect, relevance, reciprocity, responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30(3), 1–15.
Kotzee, N., & du Toit, E. (2025). Improving post-award grant management efficiency through process mapping and activity-based costing. Journal of Research Administration, 56(2), 127-159. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1491793
Kramer-Simpson, E., & Simpson, S. (2018). Technical communication client projects and nonprofit partnerships: The challenges and opportunities of community engagement. Citizenship and Advocacy in Technical Communication, 91–109.
Kurlinkus, W. (2023). Teaching ChatGPT for grant writing: An English Department senior capstone. Writers: Craft & Context, 4(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2688-9595.2023.4.1.115-124
Kurtz-Rossi, S., Okonkwo, I. A., Chen, Y., Dueñas, N., Bilodeau, T., Rushforth, A., & Klein, A. (2024). Development of a new tool for writing research key information in plain language. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice, 8(1), e29–e37.
Lai, B. (2023). The grant writing guide: A road map for scholars. Princeton University Press.
Lavelle, E. (1997). Writing style and the narrative essay. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01259.x
Lawrence, H. Y., Lussos, R. G., & Clark, J. A. (2019). Rhetorics of proposal writing: Lessons for pedagogy in research and real-world practice. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 49(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281617743016
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.
Lee, A. (2023). What are large language models used for? NVIDIA. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2023/01/26/what-are-large-language-models-used-for
Lenters, K., & Grant, K. (2016). Feedback loops: Assembling student editors, stories, and devices for multimodal peer feedback. Language Arts, 93(3), 185–199.
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W-t., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11401
Lexico (n.d.) Algorithm. Oxford University Press. https://www.lexico.com/definition/algorithm
Lindsell-Roberts, S. (2025). Grant writing with AI for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
Littlefield, J. (2025). Stochastic publics: The emergence and ethics of AI-generated publics in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 39(1), 26–41. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10506519241280592
Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384
Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022). Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–23). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501825
Lowe, R., & Leike, J. (2022). Aligning language models to follow instructions. OpenAI. https://openai.com/research/instruction-following
Lu, C., Bu, Y., Wang, J., Ding, Y., Torvik, V., Schnaars, M., & Zhang, C. (2019). Examining scientific writing styles from the perspective of linguistic complexity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 70(5), 462–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24126
Machado, C., & Harris, C. (2026). Digital support for scholarly writing: Tools that do not break the budget. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-026-02136-5
Mann, A., Nguyen, T., & Piorun, M. (2026). The librarian’s grants handbook: Understanding the grant process from start to finish. Bloomsbury.
Markowitz, D. M. (2019). What words are worth: National Science Foundation grant abstracts indicate award funding. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(3), 264–282.
Marques, J. D. S., Duarte, A. V., Carvalho, A., Rocha, G., Martins, B., & Oliveira, A. L. (2025). Leveraging LLMs to streamline the review of public funding applications. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09674
Martineau, K. (2023). What is retrieval augmented generation? IBM.com. https://research.ibm.com/blog/retrieval-augmented-generation-RAG
Matthews, D. (2025). The risks and benefits of AI in screening research grant proposals. Science Business. https://sciencebusiness.net/news/r-d-funding/risks-and-benefits-ai-screening-research-grant-proposals
McCauley, A. K. (2020). Uplifting communities through asset-based grant writing (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University). Texas Tech University. https://hdl.handle.net/2346/104604
McMaster, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence compliance plan. U. S. Department of the Interior. https://www.doi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025-09/doi-ai-compliance-final.pdf
Miano, J. (1999). Compressed image file formats: Jpeg, png, gif, xbm, bmp. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Millar, N., Batalo, B., & Budgell, B. (2022). Trends in the use of promotional language (hype) in abstracts of successful National Institutes of Health grant applications, 1985-2020. JAMA Network Open, 5(8), e2228676. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28676
Microsoft. (n.d.). Keyboard shortcuts in Windows. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/keyboard-shortcuts-in-windows-dcc61a57-8ff0-cffe-9796-cb9706c75eec
Microsoft. (2023). Introduction to prompt engineering. Microsoft Azure AI Services. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/openai/concepts/prompt-engineering
Mikelonis, V. M., Betsinger, S. T., & Kampf, C. (2003). Grant seeking in an electronic age. Longman.
Mikesell, L., Bromley, E., & Khodyakov, D. (2013). Ethical community-engaged research: A literature review. American journal of public health, 103(12), e7–e14.
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301605
Mizumoto, A., Shintani, N., Sasaki, M., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Testing the viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100116
Mogavi, R. H., Deng, C., Kim, J. J., Zhou, P., Kwon, Y. D., Metwally, A. H. S., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., Nacke, L. E., & Hui, P. (2024). ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027
Mosavel, M., Simon, C., van Stade, D., & Buchbinder, M. (2005). Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in south africa: Engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question. Social Science & Medicine, 61(12), 2577–2587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.041
Nadkarni, P., Ohno-Machado, L., & Chapman, W. (2011). Natural language processing: An introduction. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(5), 544–551.
Nahar, M., Tripto, N. I., Xiong, A., Huang, T. H., & Lee, D. (2026). Label over logic? How source cues bias human fallacy judgments more than LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.29928. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29928
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report
National Institutes of Health (n.d.). NIH data book: research project grants (RPGs). https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/category/10
National Institutes of Health (2025). How to apply – Application guide. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://grants.nih.gov/grants-process/write-application/how-to-apply-application-guide
National Institutes of Health (2025). Supporting fairness and originality in NIH research applications. Notice No. NOT-OD-25-132. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-25-132.html
National Institutes of Health (2026). 8.6 closeout. NIH Grants Policy Statement. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps/html5/section_8/8.6_closeout.htm
National Science Foundation (2024a). Merit Review Process: FY 2023 Merit Review Digest. https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/files/FY-2023-MeritReviewDigest.pdf
National Science Foundation (2024b). Proposals and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) (May 24, 2024 ed.), National Science Foundation. https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/files/nsf24_1.pdf
National Science Foundation (2026). NSF by the numbers. https://www.nsf.gov/about/about-nsf-by-the-numbers
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586
NVIDIA (n.d.). What is Generative AI? NVIDIA. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/generative-ai
OECD. (2025). Governing with artificial intelligence: The state of play and way forward in core government functions. https://doi.org/10.1787/795de142-en
Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations. (2023). Budget narrative instructions and example. U. S. Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/OCED%20Budget%20Narrative%20Instructions%20and%20Example.pdf
Office of Management and Budget. (2026). 2 C.F.R. § 200.414: Indirect costs. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/part-200/section-200.414
Office of Management and Budget (2024). Revisions to OMB’s Statistical Policy Directive No. 15: Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity. Federal Register. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/03/29/2024-06469/revisions-to-ombs-statistical-policy-directive-no-15-standards-for-maintaining-collecting-and
OpenAI (n.d.). Tokenizer [Internet App]. OpenAI.com. https://platform.openai.com/tokenizer
OpenAI (2020). OpenAI API. OpenAI.com. https://openai.com/blog/openai-api
OpenAI (2021). GPT-3 powers the next generation of apps. OpenAI.com. https://openai.com/blog/gpt-3-apps
OpenAI (2023a). Prompt Engineering [Guide]. OpenAI.com. https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/prompt-engineering
OpenAI (2023b). What are tokens and how to count them [FAQ]? OpenAI.com. https://help.openai.com/en/articles/4936856-what-are-tokens-and-how-to-count-them
Parrilla, J. M. (2023). ChatGPT use shows that the grant-application system is broken. Nature, 623(7986), 443–443. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03238-5
Pope-Ruark, R. (2015). Introducing agile project management strategies in technical and professional communication courses. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(1), 112–133.
Porter, R. (2007). Why academics have a hard time writing good grant proposals. The Journal of Research Administration, 38(2), 37–43. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ902223.pdf
Porter, S. (2005). Using Adobe Illustrator to create complex SVG illustrations. In Visualizing Information Using SVG and X3D (pp. 266–284). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-084-2_13
Price, E., & Thomas-Evans, M. (2023). Incorporating community-engaged pedagogy in online classes: Benefits, challenges, and strong practices. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 15(2), 4–18.
Provost, F., & Kohavi, R. (1998). Glossary of terms. Machine Learning, 30, 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017181826899
Purdue Online Writing Lab (n.d.). Writing the curriculum vitae. Purdue University. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/job_search_writing/résumés_and_vitas/writing_the_cv.html
Qiu, H. S., Peng, H., Fosse, H. B., Woodruff, T. K., & Uzzi, B. (2024). Use of promotional language in grant applications and grant success. JAMA Network Open, 7(12), e2448696. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48696
Rapaport, W. (2012). Semiotic systems, computers, and the mind: How cognition could be computing. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems (IJSSS), 2(1), 32–71.
Refsnes Data (n.d.) What is HTML? W3School. https://www.w3schools.com/whatis/whatis_html.asp
Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K. (2021). Prompt programming for large language models: Beyond the few-shot paradigm. Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.07350
Rice, R. (2025). Prompting purposefully: Teaching AI rhetorical literacy in grant writing. Small Bytes. Texas Tech University Teaching, Learning, and Professional Development Center. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/tlpdc/ai-resources/small-bytes-Rich-Rice.pdf
Rice, R., Cole, R. B., & Maher, L. N. (Forthcoming). Prompting change ethically: Teaching grant writing with rhetoric and AI literacy. In C. Quick Schumann, & C. Etheridge (Eds.), Teaching grant writing: Deepening learning, deepening engagement.
Ringelheim, J. (2008). Collecting racial or ethnic data for antidiscrimination policies: A U. S. -Europe comparison. Rutgers Race and the Law Review, Suppl.Special Edition, 10(1), 39–141. https://uc.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fscholarly-journals%2Fcollecting-racial-ethnic-data-antidiscrimination%2Fdocview%2F211520432%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D2909
Rouse, M. (2023). Large language model (LLM). Techopedia. https://www.techopedia.com/definition/34948/large-language-model-llm
Russell, D. M., Morrison, E., Grebely, J., Treloar, C., Gobeil, J., Doumany, J., Stowe, M. J., Dietze, P., Seear, K., Taylor, N., & Ritter, A. (2025). Navigating the gap: An examination of funder rhetoric and reality regarding community‐research partnerships. Drug and Alcohol Review, 45(1), e70084. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70084
Samuel, A. L. (1959). Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.33.0210
Shaaban, K. (2026, March). Identifying opportunities for faculty and staff optimization and resource reduction through AI integration. In 2026 IEEE Engineering Education World Conference (EDUNINE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Shafranovich, Y. (2005). RFC 4180 common format and MIME type for comma-separated values (CSV) files. Internet Engineering Task Force. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4180.txt
Schiller, J. L., & LeMire, S. D. (2023). A survey of research administrators: Identifying administrative burden in post-award federal research grant management. Journal of Research Administration, 55(3), 9-28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1412033
Shilomboleni, H., & El-Shayeb, F. (2026). Grant writing training for undergraduate students: Contributions to deeper learning and employability. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 50(2), 196–209.
Shultz Colby, R. (2024). Theorycrafting algorithms: Teaching algorithmic literacy. Literacy in Composition Studies, 11(1), 21–41. https://doi.org.10.21623/1.11.1.3
Shuster, K., Poff, S., Chen, M., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2021). Retrieval augmentation reduces hallucination in conversation. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.07567
Smith, P. G., Morrow, R. H., & Ross, D. A. (2015). Outcome measures and case definition. In Field trials of health interventions: A toolbox (3^rd ed.; Chapter 12). Oxford University Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305519
Smotrova-Taylor, O. (2012). Wrangle the nitty-gritty of proposal details. In How to get government contracts: Have a slice of the $1 Trillion pie (pp. 221–240). Apress. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/how-to-get/9781430244974/Chapter12.html
Stanton, C. R. (2014). Crossing methodological borders: Decolonizing community-based participatory research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(5), 573–583.
Steiner, J. F. (2026). Scientific writing in the age of artificial intelligence. JAMA Internal Medicine, 186(1), 11–12.
Stempowski, D. (2023). Counting every voice: understanding hard-to-count historically undercounted populations. Census Blogs. U. S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2023/10/understanding-undercounted-populations.html
Stenglin, M., & Cléirigh, C. (2020). Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100823
Stepankiw, M. (2023, July). Pilot study of proposal writing pedagogy trends in technical communications programs: A content analysis of syllabi course descriptions and objectives. In 2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) (pp. 96–99). IEEE.
Stephens, K. K., & Kee, K. F. (2026). The social scientist’s grant guide: Funding your future in research. Bloomsbury.
Stevens, C. (2014). The community grant writing project: A flexible service-learning model for writing-intensive courses. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(2), 261–280. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1122
Stone, E. M. (2023). Content strategy or strategic content? Suggestions for developing sustainable content strategy in advocacy organizations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 53(4), 382–397.
Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Principles of best practice for community-based research. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(3), 5. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjcsl/3239521.0009.301/1
Su-Youn, Y., Miszoglad, E., & Pierce, L. R. (2023). Evaluation of ChatGPT feedback on ELL writers’ coherence and cohesion. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.06505
Surya, K. (Dec. 2022). Signaling access in grant writing pedagogy and practice. Open Words: Access and English Studies, 14(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.37514/OPW-J.2022.14.1.07
Taczak, K., Machura, I. A., DePalma, M. J., & Eady, M. J. The nature of writing as a professional: Fostering effective workplace writers through WIL. In Writing Across Professions (pp. 47–67). Routledge.
Tarsi, K., & Tuff, T. (2012). Introduction to population demographics. Nature Education Knowledge, 3(11), 3. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/introduction-to-population-demographics-83032908
Team, S. (2026). 50 AI prompts for scientists & researchers: Lab to publication. SurePrompts Blog. https://sureprompts.com/blog/ai-prompts-for-scientists
Thormundsson, B. (2023). Adoption rate in business of AI worldwide and selected countries in 2022. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1378695/ai-adoption-rate-selected-countries
Tomlison, B. (Ed). (2023). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury.
Torpey, E. (2014). Grant writer. Career Outlook, U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2014/youre-a-what/grant-writer.htm
Traag, V., Brady, E., Vincent-Lamarre, P., Bidel, F., Lopes-Bento, C., Andersen, J. P., & Bloch, C. (2025). The Matthew effect and early-career setbacks in research funding – A replication study (RoRI Working Paper No. 16, Ver. 2). Research on Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29302004.v2
U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n.d.). Overview of Grant Process. CDC.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/grants/life-cycle-overview
U. S. Department of Labor. (2024). FY 2024 budget. https://www.dol.gov/general/budget/index-2024
U. S. General Services Administration. (2024). Plain language makes it easier for the public to read, understand, and use government communications. The Plain Language Action and Information Network. https://digital.gov/guides/plain-language
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017 Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
Velez, M., & Rister, A. (2024). Beyond academic integrity: Navigating institutional and disciplinary anxieties about AI-assisted authorship in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241280646
Verhulsdonck, G., Howard, T., & Tham, J. (2021). Investigating the impact of design thinking, content strategy, and artificial intelligence: A “streams” approach for technical communication and user experience. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 51(4), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211041951
von Hippel, T., & von Hippel, C. (2015). To apply or not to apply: A survey analysis of grant writing costs and benefits. PloS one, 10(3), e0118494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118494
Wang, W., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Guo, C., & Peng, Y. (2026). The effectiveness of AI-supported personalized feedback on students’ learning outcomes and motivation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 64(3), 724–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251410020
Wang, Y. (2026). Stance in successful grant application abstracts: Trends across disciplinary domains. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 81, 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101666
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Chi, E.H., Xia, F., … & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903
What Works Clearinghouse (n.d.). Glossary of terms. Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/glossary
White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., Elnashar, A., Spencer-Smith, J., & Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382
Wiebel, W. W. (1990). Identifying and gaining access to hidden populations. NIDA Research Monograph Series, 98, 4–11. https://ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/identifying-and-gaining-access-hidden-populations-collection-and
Wu, J. (2011). Improving the writing of research papers: IMRAD and beyond. Landscape Ecology, 26(10), 1345–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9674-3
The White House (2025a). Ending illegal discrimination and restoring merit-based opportunity. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity
The White House (2025b). Fact sheet: President Donald J. Trump stops wasteful grantmaking. https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/08/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-stops-wasteful-grantmaking
White, N., & Brown, D. (2023). File format reference for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. Microsoft. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployoffice/compat/office-file-format-reference
Wilson, A. C. (2004). Introduction: indigenous knowledge recovery is indigenous empowerment. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), 359–372.
Wilson, S. (2007). Guest editorial: What is an indigenist research paradigm? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 30(2), 193.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.
Wyatt, T., Buechler-Steubing, A., Rueda, C., Naik, S., Craig, H., & Barksdale, B. (2026). Building community beyond the classroom: Promoting faculty-student interactions through a mini-grant program. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 63(3), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2026.2639447
Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T.L., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023). Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.10601
Zhang, Y. (2023). Managing your digital research identity with ORCiD. In M. R. Dreker, & K. J. Downey (eds.), Building Your Academic Research Digital Identity (pp.35–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50317-7_4